Taxes. Fun.

When it comes to taxes, societally we're probably under-discussing Newton's Third Law of Motion.

As a refresher, that's the one that says "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." When you tax something, there is going to be a reaction. It might not be equal, but it will exist.

This is important, because policy-makers love to pretend that this is not the case. There is always some reaction, and in economics, these reactions tend to work on curves. Here is one way to think about it. If a tax rate is at 30% today, and that rate is raised to 100%, there would be no reason to work unless you love your boss as much as the employees at One Day In July. People do not wait until the last percentage change, from 99% to 100%, to alter their behavior. Unlike activation energy in chemistry, or static friction in physics, in economics, human behavior tends to work on curves.

So that is base point #1. Base point #2 is that no one really knows how to measure the unknown, or opportunity cost, or "value of doing something else relative to what you are doing." When I read an academic economics paper, I first try to convince myself that I can skip all those mathematical summations, that I can always go back and figure them out. By the end of the paper I'm skipping most of the paper, but console myself that it's probably wrong anyway because of the difficulty of measuring opportunity costs.


Taxes fire up lots of people! Instead of the classical arguments, let's look at two effects that rarely see media discussion.

1. Tax Rates on Corporations. The 14th Amendment, intended to abolish slavery, by way of a court reporter's footnote in Santa Clary County vs Southern Pacific Railroad Co led to the concept of personhood for the U.S. Corporation. From an accounting perspective corporations get interesting. If you raise a tax rate on a corporation, you are not applying an equal standard. Many expenses are paid by certain types of companies after taxes. For example, all that inventory in retail stores? That is bought, initially, with after tax-dollars. Most expenses in a law firm? Before tax.

If you raise the rate on this corporation-who-before-the-court-reporter-was-not-a-person, and if the business happens to be in an industry that underfunded its lobbyists, it now needs to find funding somewhere else to expand. It may not be able to do so on its own, now-reduced cash flows. The financial industry does not complain about this opportunity, as it creates a new customer for lending, and control transfers from the business to the financiers.

2. Silos of Capital. When the private equity folks are not making lots of money on the new business channel in #1 above, they can use their spare time to complain that the higher tax rates on capital gains will harm their hundred-million-dollar take-home pay. This pitch has not sold well with the American public so they have rebranded it as "harming investment in startups." Here it gets interesting, because they're not entirely wrong.

Remember the first point of this email. Behavior works on curves. Here, the investors needed for the startup have to move the capital from somewhere else, and in many cases, when the tax is higher, they are reluctant to move it. The startup would have to have an even higher expected return, and most startups fail. So inefficiency is created in the economy, as capital is now trapped in assets that may not create innovation, and may not be optimal. Transaction friction silos capital into non-optimal positions, and there it sits.

A prominent counter-argument is that Red-Bull fueled entrepreneurs do not think about capital gains when they form a business. Red-Bull fueled entrepreneurs think about code and crypto, not boring things like taxes! Again, things tend to work on curves. And Isaac Newton has a funny habit of showing up.

We have this capital friction problem every day at One Day In July. As new clients join, often in securities that we don't favor, we have to decide whether to leave the position or sell it and recognize a tax hit. Because the tax is rarely zero in a brokerage account, many times capital gets siloed in places that enrich the financial industry even more.


It's a minefield out there when you bring up taxes! The opinion writers on the pages of the NY Times and the Wall St Journal have found perfect clarity on the topic. For the rest of us, in practice this is more like whack-a-mole.

Dan Cunningham

Return to Articles
How We Are Different
Low-fee index funds. Transparent & fiduciary financial advisors.
Local Financial Advisor
We are in your community. We are local.
Investment Management
We tailor to each client. Index funds at the core.
Index Funds
Broad market exposure, low expense.
Dan's Corner
Meaningful musings from our founder.
Fiduciary
Your best interests are our priority.
Low Fees
Our fees are among the lowest in the nation.
Financial Planner
Financial advisor optimizes your financial picture.
U.S. Treasury Bonds
Use Treasury Bonds to reduce risk.
Book Recommendations
Here are some of our favorites
Who We Serve
We work with clients nationwide from all financial backgrounds.
When Should I Invest?
Life transitions = important financial decisions.
Retirement: 401k and More
Retiring? Plan the future you want.
IRA Rollovers
401k Rollovers. IRA Rollovers
Active vs. Passive Investing
We believe there is a winner in this debate.
The Investment Process
How we work: low-cost index funds, personalized attention.
Simplicity
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Investing: What to Focus On
Low-fee index funds. fee-only advisor.
Switching Financial Advisors
Can be uncomfortable, but an important step.
Advisor Recruiting
We attract top-tier talent. Not your usual firm.
Basic Investing
Let's start with Investing 101.
Understanding Your Financial Statement
Let's break it down to basics.
Taxes on Investments
What causes taxes within your investments?
Behavioral Economics
The less emotion, the better.
Timing the Market in 2020
2020 - a case study in the futility of market timing.
How Financial Firms Bill
Fee-based vs. fee-only, and lots more.
Who Supports Indexing?
Bogle, Swensen, Buffett, and others.
Transparency
One click to see our fees.
Mutual Funds vs ETFs
Clarifying the difference.
Does Stock Picking Work?
The research says no.
Countering Arguments Against Index Funds
What happens in a down market?
Annuities
Lots of fees, little clarity.
How Do Mutual Funds Work?
Invest in the basket.
How to Relieve Financial Stress
New client? anxiety is normal.
Financial Terms Glossary
Common investment terms you should know.
Firm Comparison
One Day In July vs the competition.
Retired Investing
Retiring? Let us help.
Accounts We Manage
We manage a wide range of investment account types.
High Net Worth Investors
Preserve and grow your wealth.
Investing an Inheritance
Prioritizing and planning for the future.
Frequently Asked Questions
Good questions, real answers.
Female Investors
Your voice needs to be heard. We are listening.
For the Business Owner
Choosing what's best for your business.
Environmental Investing
Carbon intensity, fossil fuels.

Locations

Vermont

Connecticut

United States

Services

Individuals

401k Plans

Institutions

Environmental

Account Types

Differentiators

Cash Flows

Low Fees

Fiduciary

Dedicated Advisor

Materials

Advisors: Join Us

Careers

Articles on Investing

About the Secure Act

Quarterly Booklets

Resources

Vermont Investment Management

Vermont Retirement Planning

Vermont Wealth Management

Vermont Financial Advisors

Investment Tools

In the Media

Shelburne, VT Financial Advisor

Frank Koster | Josh Kruk | Keith McCarthy

5247 Shelburne Rd, Suite #101

Shelburne, VT 05482

(802) 777-9768

Stowe, VT Finanical Advisor

Available for meetings in Stowe.

Peter Egolf

(802) 999-2321

Burlington, VT Financial Advisor

Hans Smith | Katie Muttitt

Nancy Westbrook | Peter Egolf

77 College Street #3A

Burlington, VT 05401

(802) 503-8280

Darien, CT Financial Advisor

Available for meetings in Darien.

Keith McCarthy

(203) 554-9466


v 2.0.3 | © One Day In July LLC. All Rights Reserved.